K-9 Set For Academy, Unit Still Underfunded
Washington Township Police bringing in new unit, but single officer taking on cost by himself.
He isn’t red, and he’s an average-sized Belgium Malinois, but his name is Cliff.
That’s the soon-to-be newest member of the Washington Township Police Department, a K-9 expected to fill the place of Kobe, who spent nearly a year on the force from 2011 to 2012.
Cliff, along with his owner, Officer Mike Thompson, will enter the training academy April 1 and is scheduled to graduate June 1.
The entire program, however, is being paid for by Thompson himself, and not the department or town. All required equipment for the K-9 Unit was previously secured by Officer Peter Cecere, who is now retired.
Other expenses, however (veterinarian bills, housing, food), are being taken on by Thompson. The costs for the academy and other expenses are in the area of $12,000, Thompson said.
Residents interested in helping this cause can send or drop-off donations to the Washington Township Police Department, care of Washington Township PBA Local #301. The mailing address for the police department is 1 East Springtown Road, Long Valley, NJ 07853.
Joanne
5:13 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
I for one am all for having a new dog. and I will contribute. You should read the book "Soldier Dogs" it was a great book and tells you all about the dogs that they use in the services from past to present, and about some that are released to police departments, it also mentions that the dogs also can have multiple handlers through their careers, which if I remember correctly from past articles said they don't do that.
Reality Chuck
8:47 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
I don't understand yet how/why this officer is going to cover all these charges without a compensation plan from the PD. If he becomes the dedicated K-9 officer then there will be associated costs to backfill his present position or assigned responsibilities. A dedicated K-9 officer will have hours outside his regularly scheduled tour that will have to be paid as overtime. These are basic program management questions and an not "anti-police" rant. You cannot have a K-9 program in a civil service position that costs nothing....and it shouldn't be presented that way.
Gadfly
1:14 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
I can't believe that it supporting a k9 unit is a reasonable use of the townships funds, particularly when you consider that the investment can be lost so easily if the officer is injured, or simply moves on. I have to say that it's entirely appropriate for the officer to take on these costs.
DXJ
5:38 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
I agree with Gadfly, yet there is value in having a K9 on the force, which is why I haven't hesitated to donate.
FourScore
6:02 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
What value is there beyond the PR angle of; "hey, it's really cool that we have a police dog here in Washington Twp"???
A police dog can sniff out narcotics, but if the police have consent to search a vehicle, they'll probably find them anyway. A dog can hunt down a fugitive, but how often do we have dangerous fugitives running through the woods of Washington Twp? Any other purposes I'm not thinking of?
DXJ
8:56 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
A K9 fulfills specific law enforcement needs. A K9 can search a building faster and more efficiently than several officers. The dog can find a lost/disabled child or elderly person faster, which is very important when lost time can mean the difference between life and death. The police also need probable cause to search without consent, and an "indicating" dog is probable cause.
But Gadfly does make a valid point that the dog is not like any ordinary tool that can be used by any officer. The nature of the training imprints the animal on one officer and makes it difficult or impossible to transfer to another. For this reason, I think it's appropriate to shift some of the costs to the officer and to rely more on donations from the public at large.
DXJ
9:17 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Frankly, I would rather a local K9 be used to find that distraught man in the corn field last year than a state helicopter flying low over head, causing confusion and scaring the crap out of people.
FourScore
12:15 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013
Well in my mind, a police dog (who is considered a bona-fide member of the force) sniffing for drugs is no less of a 4th amendment violation that an officer looking or feeling for drugs. However, I'm sure the Supreme Court would disagree with me (if they don't mind warrantless wire taps, they're not going to care about a drug sniffing dog).
As far as finding a missing person or child, that's a legitimate use, but how often does it happen? What I would like to know is how many times during the year that we had Kobe on the force was he actually called into service. I wonder if that was considered before we decided to obtain another dog.
Hookerman
1:05 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013
I also would like everyone on the patch to tell me why I am such a loser.
Hookerman
12:10 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
The Hookerman no one likes is Kibitzer. Kibitzer is the Hookerman that no one likes. That's it! That's it!! Einhorn is Finkel! Finkel is Einhorn! Einhorn's a man!!!! Oh my God, Einhorn is a man!!!
Lou Sassle
6:28 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
I heard the new dog is being trained to chew on unemployed men who have an umbilical to the Patch. I would be nervous if I were you " Hookerman ". Are you a know-it-all regarding police dogs in addition to the vast body of knowledge you have on every other subject ?
rusty corvair
12:57 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Ouch!!!!! That's gonna leave a mark!
Mike oxlong
7:29 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013
Hey hey
Peace
12:42 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013
Lol, Lou!
Hookerman
8:01 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013
I am a loser. My mom does not like me.
Comfortably Numb
8:49 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013
come on Hookerman....don't be so down on yourself :(
If I've told you once I've told you a hundred times.....There is somebody just like you out there, somebody that will see your good side, just be patient.
Liberty
9:31 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
I don't understand why affluent Washington Twp. (the town government, not the residents) can't fund the expenses for a K-9 unit dog? And aren't there state or federal grants for this? I think a dog is an excellent law enforcement tool, way beyond any PR benefit, and I will contribute.
Reality Chuck
10:57 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
A state or federal grant will not cover all the costs in a given year and/or for a career of the officer. Can anyone provide the specific goals of the program that include measurements and fixed costs? Everybody loves a puppy...but that's not how government agencies should manage.
LVMom
11:58 am on Thursday, May 2, 2013
i agree...
Hookerman
4:21 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Kibitzer?!?!?! I don't even know her!!!
Comfortably Numb
9:20 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Holy crap, you crushed Hookerman to the point where he had to change his name.
Dude.....that's a cyber victory. I kind of feel bad for the guy.........but he deserved most of it.