patching...
Breaking: Down Trees Cut Power for 1,000 Homes Saturday »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

K-9 Set For Academy, Unit Still Underfunded

Washington Township Police bringing in new unit, but single officer taking on cost by himself.

 

He isn’t red, and he’s an average-sized Belgium Malinois, but his name is Cliff.

That’s the soon-to-be newest member of the Washington Township Police Department, a K-9 expected to fill the place of Kobe, who spent nearly a year on the force from 2011 to 2012.

Cliff, along with his owner, Officer Mike Thompson, will enter the training academy April 1 and is scheduled to graduate June 1.

The entire program, however, is being paid for by Thompson himself, and not the department or town. All required equipment for the K-9 Unit was previously secured by Officer Peter Cecere, who is now retired.

Other expenses, however (veterinarian bills, housing, food), are being taken on by Thompson. The costs for the academy and other expenses are in the area of $12,000, Thompson said.

Residents interested in helping this cause can send or drop-off donations to the Washington Township Police Department, care of Washington Township PBA Local #301. The mailing address for the police department is 1 East Springtown Road, Long Valley, NJ 07853.

Related Topics: K-9 Unit, Mike Thompson, and Washington Township Police

Joanne

5:13 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

I for one am all for having a new dog. and I will contribute. You should read the book "Soldier Dogs" it was a great book and tells you all about the dogs that they use in the services from past to present, and about some that are released to police departments, it also mentions that the dogs also can have multiple handlers through their careers, which if I remember correctly from past articles said they don't do that.

Reply

Reality Chuck

8:47 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

I don't understand yet how/why this officer is going to cover all these charges without a compensation plan from the PD. If he becomes the dedicated K-9 officer then there will be associated costs to backfill his present position or assigned responsibilities. A dedicated K-9 officer will have hours outside his regularly scheduled tour that will have to be paid as overtime. These are basic program management questions and an not "anti-police" rant. You cannot have a K-9 program in a civil service position that costs nothing....and it shouldn't be presented that way.

Reply

Gadfly

1:14 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

I can't believe that it supporting a k9 unit is a reasonable use of the townships funds, particularly when you consider that the investment can be lost so easily if the officer is injured, or simply moves on. I have to say that it's entirely appropriate for the officer to take on these costs.

Reply

DXJ

5:38 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

I agree with Gadfly, yet there is value in having a K9 on the force, which is why I haven't hesitated to donate.

Reply

FourScore

6:02 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

What value is there beyond the PR angle of; "hey, it's really cool that we have a police dog here in Washington Twp"???

A police dog can sniff out narcotics, but if the police have consent to search a vehicle, they'll probably find them anyway. A dog can hunt down a fugitive, but how often do we have dangerous fugitives running through the woods of Washington Twp? Any other purposes I'm not thinking of?

Reply
Comment_arrow

DXJ

8:56 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

A K9 fulfills specific law enforcement needs. A K9 can search a building faster and more efficiently than several officers. The dog can find a lost/disabled child or elderly person faster, which is very important when lost time can mean the difference between life and death. The police also need probable cause to search without consent, and an "indicating" dog is probable cause.

But Gadfly does make a valid point that the dog is not like any ordinary tool that can be used by any officer. The nature of the training imprints the animal on one officer and makes it difficult or impossible to transfer to another. For this reason, I think it's appropriate to shift some of the costs to the officer and to rely more on donations from the public at large.

Comment_arrow

DXJ

9:17 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Frankly, I would rather a local K9 be used to find that distraught man in the corn field last year than a state helicopter flying low over head, causing confusion and scaring the crap out of people.

Comment_arrow

FourScore

12:15 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Well in my mind, a police dog (who is considered a bona-fide member of the force) sniffing for drugs is no less of a 4th amendment violation that an officer looking or feeling for drugs. However, I'm sure the Supreme Court would disagree with me (if they don't mind warrantless wire taps, they're not going to care about a drug sniffing dog).

As far as finding a missing person or child, that's a legitimate use, but how often does it happen? What I would like to know is how many times during the year that we had Kobe on the force was he actually called into service. I wonder if that was considered before we decided to obtain another dog.

Comment_arrow

Hookerman

1:05 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I also would like everyone on the patch to tell me why I am such a loser.

Comment_arrow

Hookerman

12:10 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

The Hookerman no one likes is Kibitzer. Kibitzer is the Hookerman that no one likes. That's it! That's it!! Einhorn is Finkel! Finkel is Einhorn! Einhorn's a man!!!! Oh my God, Einhorn is a man!!!

Lou Sassle

6:28 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

I heard the new dog is being trained to chew on unemployed men who have an umbilical to the Patch. I would be nervous if I were you " Hookerman ". Are you a know-it-all regarding police dogs in addition to the vast body of knowledge you have on every other subject ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

rusty corvair

12:57 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Ouch!!!!! That's gonna leave a mark!

Hookerman

8:01 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

I am a loser. My mom does not like me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Comfortably Numb

8:49 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

come on Hookerman....don't be so down on yourself :(
If I've told you once I've told you a hundred times.....There is somebody just like you out there, somebody that will see your good side, just be patient.

Liberty

9:31 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

I don't understand why affluent Washington Twp. (the town government, not the residents) can't fund the expenses for a K-9 unit dog? And aren't there state or federal grants for this? I think a dog is an excellent law enforcement tool, way beyond any PR benefit, and I will contribute.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Reality Chuck

10:57 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

A state or federal grant will not cover all the costs in a given year and/or for a career of the officer. Can anyone provide the specific goals of the program that include measurements and fixed costs? Everybody loves a puppy...but that's not how government agencies should manage.

Hookerman

4:21 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Kibitzer?!?!?! I don't even know her!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Comfortably Numb

9:20 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Holy crap, you crushed Hookerman to the point where he had to change his name.
Dude.....that's a cyber victory. I kind of feel bad for the guy.........but he deserved most of it.

Leave a comment