News Alert
Fire That Gutted Long Valley Home Deemed…

Cost, Redundancy Behind Cut of Special Services Director in Twp. Schools

Responsibilities and duties will be done by school-level administrators in coming school year, superintendent says.

As changes in state mandates continue and an ever-increasing need to be fiscally responsible, many duties in the Washington Township School district are being handled at the school building level rather than administratively.

And that’s why, according to Superintendent Jeff Mohre, the Director of Special Services position in the district is not included in the 2014-15 budget and is being formally eliminated by the board of education.

A need for greater support at the school level has been created, Mohre said, as administrators become saddled with Common Core State Standards, Teacher/Principal performance and accountability and other initiatives overseen in the central office.

The elimination of the position will save the district about $50,000, Mohre said.

Mohre said he was finalizing a “new administrative schematic” to reflect the new support structure in the district’s school buildings.

While the director position will be gone, the Supervisor of Special Education will still oversee curriculum for that category in the district. Maryann Millar currently fills that role, and is being offered a contract in the amount of $148,163 this week for work in the 2014-15 school year.

“Based on the current success of our programs, and the professional skill of our faculty, I have full confidence in our collective abilities to continue to provide effective programming and services,” Mohre said.

Child study teams in the district will continue developing Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) and collaborate with each student’s parents or guardians as well as teachers, Mohre said. The plans are then implemented by the student’s teachers.

The coordination of services like academic support, gifted and talented, nursing, guidance and homebound instruction, which are now primarily done at the school level, has “enabled the elimination of the director position,” he said.

That reasoning isn’t working for one concerned resident, however. Elizabeth Rupprecht, a school social worker and adjunct instructor charged that the district isn’t ready, nor is it equipped to handle the loss of an administrator in such an important role.

In her letter to the editor to Long Valley Patch, which can be read in its entirety by clicking here, Rupprecht implored concerned residents to speak up to the board of education, and said, “do the principals and supervisor have the expertise and experience to take on additional work including evaluations (3 required observations, consultations and reports each year for every Special Services staff member), collaboration with parents regarding the programs, services and possible out of district placements found in their IEP’s. Please note that many of the principals are fairly new and may not have the expertise and experience to fulfill these tasks.”

Further, Rupprecht took issue with the position’s proposed elimination not being found in the district’s recent budget presentation.

From a transparency and trust standpoint,” she wrote, “why was this decision made secretly with no itemization in the budget presentation and no notification to the parents of students with special needs?”

The 2014-15 budget for the district, which did not include the Director of Special Services position, was adopted by the board of education on Tuesday, April 29.

What do you think? Is this a good move by the district to save money, or is the cost savings not worth the loss of a special services director?

Minuteman Too May 07, 2014 at 07:07 AM
The problem is "Common Core"....and you ain't seen nuthin' yet...
longvalley1952 May 07, 2014 at 08:14 AM
Perhaps there should be a position created to dust and Pledge 1000 empty seats? Just wipe them down with dollar bills and taxpayer tears. Clean empty school chairs will make our property values go up.
Chuck Ruff May 07, 2014 at 10:57 AM
We can't afford a Special Services Director for the district, and yet many were crying for a full time security guard in every school after the Sandy Hook incident. And what does the high school have? A Facilities Coordinator, whose main purpose is to direct traffic??? I'd say our priorities are somewhat out of whack.
Lisa Clarke May 07, 2014 at 04:34 PM
Has anyone looked at the job description for this position and determined where the specific duties for this job will be picked up?
Lisa Clarke May 07, 2014 at 06:12 PM
Of course the last time I called the Director of Special Services (the 2nd time ever) with a concern about the implementation of my son's IEP which could not seemingly be resolved with his case manager, I was told that I should contact the Superintendent . And if it could not be resolved from there to go to the county supervisor.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »