Planning Board OKs School Bus Facility

Group provides courtesy review, recommends next steps to be taken for governing body.

The agreed upon shared service that would allow the Washington Township School district to put a bus maintenance facility on the land currently housing the received a positive review from the planning board this week.

The board gave a courtesy review of the site plan at its most recent meeting, with school transportation director Paul Henry and DPW superintendent Scott Frech representing both sides.

The facility would allow the district to bring its bus maintenance, inspections and cleaning in-house, as it currently outsources those needs.

A four-bay, 5,000 square-foot structure has been proposed that would include three full-time mechanics, Frech said.

The facility is expected to cost approximately $750,000 to create, and would save the school district an estimated $115,000 per year.

“The cost is one-third of the original proposed facility,” said Mayor Ken Short, representing the planning board. “This will be a one-stop-shop for fuel, maintenance and cleaning. It’s going to save the taxpayers quite a bit of money.”

The township will erect the building, and the board of education will hold a long-term lease on the property.

As many as eight buses could be at the facility at one time, Henry said, during state inspection cycles. But most of the time only buses needing maintenance or repairs will be on the property, Henry said.

The board asked if the facility would allow for buses from surrounding districts to come in and use the services provided.

Henry said the board has considered that idea, which would help bring in revenue and get maximum value from the facility, but has yet to pursue the effort.

Buses will still be kept in the bus yard at the Board of Education building on West Mill Road.

The board moved to make a positive recommendation to the township committee, which will take the next step in bringing the project to completion.

Just Sayin' March 27, 2012 at 03:40 PM
David - That would make sense, but I still don't understand why get into the bus maintence business in the first place?! They should still do what you suggested then they would save money because they are REDUCING spending. Spending money for future "savings" is not guaranteed "savings". If you sell a building I GUARANTEE they will save money:)
rose March 27, 2012 at 03:57 PM
That is exactly what I was thinking - the bus maintenance business, mechanic's salaries? is this part of what the edauction adminisitration should be focused on?
Claire March 27, 2012 at 10:21 PM
I do not agree busing should be outsourced. We have an unusual community landscape here with many dangerous curves and stops. I have to say although my kids are out of school, I think it's the safest route. It may be cheaper but in this case not best choice
Just Sayin' March 28, 2012 at 01:34 AM
Claire we aren't saying to outsource busing, just no to building a bus "maintenance" facility. But as I type this, I am sure this is all a moot point, as I am sure they unanimously passed the next step to breaking ground.
Claire March 28, 2012 at 10:19 AM
Leta, my comment was a reply to David J about outsourcing all busing. Maybe I misunderstood his point. I agree with outsourcing the bus maintenance.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »